America
Keeps Palestinians on the Welfare Dole
The United States
recently made the largest single pledge
to the United Nations Relief and Works
Agency (UNRWA) for Palestinian Refugees.
The $80 million will be used to support
education, health and relief for the
approximately 3.6 million registered
Palestinian refugees. This is very
charitable, but why isn't the Palestinian
Authority using the billions of dollars
pledged by the international community
to care for its people? And why is
the U.S. contributing more than the
Arab nations that express such heartfelt
concern for the Palestinians in diplomatic
fora?
The truth is that UNRWA
aid is nothing but welfare for Palestinian
refugees and, like welfare programs in
general, it has encouraged Palestinians
to remain impoverished and discouraged
their resettlement. This has had harmful
political repercussions as well over
the years, helping to create a breeding
ground for hatred and terrorism and providing
a diplomatic club with which to regularly
beat Israel.
UNRWA was created in1949
to substitute public works for direct
relief and to promote economic development.
While the hundreds of thousands of Jewish
refugees from Arab countries received
no international assistance, Palestinians
received millions of dollars through
UNRWA.
By the mid-1950s, it
was evident neither the refugees nor
the Arab states were prepared to cooperate
on the development projects foreseen
by the agency as a means of alleviating
the Palestinians' situation. No one was
willing to contribute to any plan that
could be interpreted as fostering resettlement.
The Arabs preferred to cling to the hope
that Israel would be either destroyed
or forced to repatriate all the Palestinians.
At the 1957 Refugee Conference in Syria,
a resolution was adopted stating that "any
discussion aimed at a solution of the
Palestine problem which will not be based
on ensuring the refugees' right to annihilate
Israel will be regarded as a desecration
of the Arab people and an act of treason" (Beirut
al Massa, July 15, 1957).
The treatment of the
refugees in the decade following their
displacement was best summed up by a
former director of UNRWA, Ralph Garroway,
in August 1958: "The Arab States
do not want to solve the refugee problem.
They want to keep it as an open sore,
as an affront to the United Nations and
as a weapon against Israel. Arab leaders
don't give a damn whether the refugees
live or die."
Little has changed in
succeeding years. Arab governments have
frequently offered jobs, housing, land
and other benefits to Arabs and non-Arabs,
excluding Palestinians. For example,
Saudi Arabia chose not to use unemployed
Palestinian refugees to alleviate its
labor shortage in the late 1970's and
early 1980's. Instead, thousands of South
Koreans and other Asians were recruited
to fill jobs. Kuwait employed Palestinians,
but denied them citizenship, and, in
the wake of the Gulf War, expelled more
than 300,000 of them.
By the late 1990s, the
number of Palestinian refugees on UNRWA
rolls had risen to five or six times
the number that left Palestine in 1948.
Though the popular image is of refugees
in squalid camps, less than one-third
of the Palestinians are in the 59 UNRWA-run
camps.
Ironically, during the
years that Israel controlled the Gaza
Strip, a consistent effort was made to
get the Palestinians into permanent housing.
The Palestinians opposed the idea because
the frustrated and bitter inhabitants
of the camps provided the various terrorist
factions with their manpower. Moreover,
the Arab states routinely pushed for
the adoption of UN resolutions demanding
that Israel desist from the removal of
Palestinian refugees from camps in Gaza
and the West Bank. They preferred to
keep the Palestinians as symbols of Israeli "oppression."
So now that the Palestinians
control their own fate and have the opportunity
to build housing and shut down the camps,
what are they doing? Nothing. The Palestinian
Authority has decided not to do anything
for the refugees living in the camps
until the final-status talks with Israel
are resolved. The Palestinian refugees
are still being used as political pawns,
this time by their own leaders.
Money has never been
an impediment to solving the refugee
problem. In addition to UNRWA, which
has evolved into the worst example of
a welfare program gone awry, the international
community pledged $2.1 billion in assistance
to the Palestine Authority in 1993 and
another $3 billion in 1998. The United
States has already distributed $375 million
in direct aid and $125 million worth
of loan guarantees and promised another
$400 million in assistance — on top of
the annual U.S. contribution to UNRWA.
For 50 years UNRWA has
stood as an example of all that is wrong
with the effort to help the Palestinians.
Instead of increasing aid (last year
the U.S. contribution was increased 4.5
percent and this year 9.5 percent above
that) U.S. funding for this agency should
cease and UNRWA should be dismantled.
The Palestine Authority should be required
to account for the funds it has received
from the international community and
be told that it is now responsible for
the refugees under its control. As for
the Palestinians in other Arab countries,
a limited number should be allowed to
live in a future Palestinian state, the
remainder must become citizens of the
states where they now live. |