Have
Russia and Iran Checkmated Obama?
President Obama’s decision to abandon
the plan to deploy a missile defense
system in Europe shocked many analysts
in the United States as well as our
eastern European allies who were counting
on the shield to protect them from
the threat of Russian missiles. Perhaps
the only one who was not surprised
was the political chess grandmaster
Vladimir Putin.
I did not understand the game that
Putin was playing until a chance meeting
two years ago with an Israeli who had
just returned from a meeting at the
Kremlin. At the time, the United States
and its European allies were pushing
for stronger sanctions against Iran
at the United Nations and the Russians,
as they had up to that point, refused
to go along and threatened to veto
any Security Council resolution that
would have any teeth. The Russians
were also in the process of completing
construction of a nuclear power plant
in Bushehr, Iran, which further undermined
the campaign to prevent Iran from developing
nuclear weapons.
My Israeli interlocutor explained
that the Russians were the world’s
best chess players and the Putin was
already looking several moves ahead.
He was only interested in using Iran
as a pawn in U.S.-Russian relations.
Russian maneuvers at the UN and elsewhere
to obstruct the push for sanctions,
the Israeli suggested, were really
a tactic designed to extract concessions
from President Bush on matters that
were of greater concern to his country.
At or near the top of Putin’s priority
list was stopping the U.S. deployment
of missiles in the Czech Republic and
Poland.
Bush was never willing to make the
deal, believing that the U.S. could
not abandon its allies and that Russia
remained a serious enough threat to
warrant the deployment. Obama, however,
appears to have accepted the views
of Britain, France, Germany that Iran
poses the most serious threat at the
moment to Europe as well as the Middle
East. The decision was made, not coincidentally,
just before the planned meeting of
the allies with Iranian officials.
The administration has threatened to
push for stronger sanctions if Iran
does not agree to halt its nuclear
program, but this threat is empty without
a promise of Russian support at the
UN.
Not surprisingly, Russia does not
want to give the impression that support
of sanctions was a quid pro quo for
Obama’s decision, and the Russian foreign
minister immediately said the imposition
of sanctions would be a “serious mistake.”
Secretary of State Clinton visited
Moscow apparently hoping this was simply
an effort to avoid the appearance of
a deal, but her hosts reiterated their
obstructionist policies, effectively
checkmating Obama.
Worse, the Iranians may have already
reached checkmate in their own match
with Obama. News reports indicate that
the International Atomic Energy Agency
has concluded Iran has the ability
to make a nuclear bomb and is on the
way to developing a missile system
able to carry an atomic warhead. U.S.
intelligence officials now appear ready
to admit their earlier estimates were
wrong. This may also explain Obama’s
decision to create a missile shield
against Iranian rockets and reflect
the view Secretary of State Hilary
Clinton let slip in her comment about
offering a defense umbrella to Middle
Eastern nations that the administration
accepts a nuclear Iran as unavoidable.
The truth is that the pursuit of sanctions
against Iran has never made sense.
Sanctions have too many holes and
the Iranians have lived with them for
years without changing their policy.
The attempt at coercion never took
into account the Iranian perspective
that they have a great nation, just
as entitled to nuclear weapons as any
of the current nuclear powers, and
that it is worth some short-term pain
for the long-term gain of becoming
the hegemon in the region. Moreover,
they know from the experience of India
and Pakistan, that once they have the
bomb, the world will accept the fact
and relations will return to normal.
Iran now appears to playing for more
time in stringing out talks with the
Western powers. Deals on the table
may still allow enough time for Iran
to complete its nuclear work, conceal
it further or otherwise retain the
option to build a bomb.
Israel has been anxiously watching
as these games have played out. They
must decide on their own moves, and
perhaps Obama is looking ahead to their
play.
By the end of the year, if not sooner,
we should know if Iran can be stopped,
and then we will learn whether Obama
is a foreign policy grandmaster or
whether it is time for him to flip
over his king.
|